Ask any woman for banes, the top 10 in her life, and I swear she will say \"bra \".
For such a trivial-
Although often expensive
An interior decoration where bras often fail on key performance indicators
That is, the support, comfort, looks quite attractive.
Too much lace, you look like you\'re in your T-shirt.
You will surely let others down.
Too Wired, the damn thing will twist and deform in the washing machine and torture you for the rest of your life.
That\'s why Berlei\'s new bra ad is so eye-catching that makes me laugh.
Showing all the ways in which women \"suppress\", \"bind\", \"be forced to separate\", \"hide\", \"stimulate, poke, press, push, compress, limit \"and\" expose \"their breasts, 45-
The second ad is the most honest and relevant underwear ad I have ever seen.
So why is Facebook and Instagram banning it for \"offensive\" false reasons?
Who offended?
For those half of the population who endure a bra twist every day, this is certainly not.
Of course, for the other half, they can\'t realistically check how they feel about living with a nasty dairy mom.
For a website in India that has been accused of imperialism, live streaming of human rights violations, spreading fake news and spying on users, it\'s ridiculous that social media giants are already full of care when it comes to chests.
Even though these lovely parts of our anatomy actually fill the offspring, they are so widely visible that you have to be a monk who lives on a desert island and will not see a pair recently.
Berlei\'s advertising is not free.
It is not vulgar, not even sexual.
Rather, it\'s a fistdump-
Valuable advertising, solving the head of a woman\'s physical problem, or rather, on the breast.
Yes, there is a chest beating under the sports bra, the woman tries to cover the nipple, stimulate or poke back into the unsatisfactory clothes, but this is the life of the breast.
Berlei said Facebook will not be allowed to advertise on its platform because of \"pixelated nudity, apparently paying attention to bouncing breasts and over-magnified images.
In addition, the company\'s advertising policy does not allow video to focus on only one body part.
This is absolutely nonsense.
You can\'t see 20 these days-year-
The old pimples were burst, the mole was cut off, or the skin cancer was injured by a laser blast.
When I checked last time, hair growth ads tend to focus on the scalp.
Is this definitely a single body part?
But more importantly, in an era where underwear is often imitated by caramel --
Toned glets with no similarities to your average woman, it\'s great to see women with real breasts show their real problems.
As Berlei said: \"advertising emphasizes the everyday reality that women have in an honest and real way.
As with the bra itself, advertising is designed to empower women to take care of themselves and invest in them.
\"As the mother of two teenage girls, I can\'t believe the hypocrisy of Facebook and Instagram.
Obviously, it\'s OK to allow the underage girl endless highly sexy images (
Look at you, Instagram)
However, some common breasts are considered offensive.
Research shows that people who are more involved in social media are more prone to physical image problems, so you will think that these sites will do responsible things and try to solve the problem.
According to the latest survey by the Australian delegation, Australian women do not like their bodies, 38 girls are very concerned about their physical image, all media
Social or other
Responsible for showing greater diversity.
Facebook and Instagram have gained such an opportunity that they should seize to not only show the real body, but also get some good media in the process.
Instead, they have done their own chest.